|
Post by paranoia on Jul 30, 2013 0:04:06 GMT
Yeah but again, that won't work. Town has to rely that Colby is in fact town and not a sk or they've already lost. Therefore the only way forward is to lynch Dizzy, simple as that. Two kills means there's a mafioso still alive, and there's only one person who could be mafia at this point in time. Like there is no other lynch to go after logically. bill should at least see that.
Colby killing cookies is fairly obtuse but the fact he didn't bother reading doesn't surprise me at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jul 30, 2013 15:03:03 GMT
Even if they've already lost, they still have to decide between lynching the scum and the serial killer. Actually, not lynching may be a viable option. In our case of 2 masons, 1 vigilante, and 1 scum, if there is no lynch, the scum gets a last kill and the vig gets the last scum. Game over, town wins. In the counterfactual case of 2 masons, 1 serial killer, and 1 scum, if there is no lynch, anyone could win. Let's assume the serial killer wins if the game ends (all scum dead, or number of scum greater than or equal to number of other players) and they're still alive. Scum and serial killer could kill each other and town wins. Scum and serial killer could kill both town, and serial killer wins. Scum can only win if they kill the serial killer and the serial killer kills town. Very nice set up for mind games. :evil: Anyway, if Colby were a serial killer, the town's best hope would be a no lynch. And if Colby is a town vigilante, then a no lynch still results in a town win.
|
|
|
Post by jaade on Jul 30, 2013 15:15:56 GMT
Lizzy was scum in HK2 on GB subbing in for sachertorte
|
|
|
Post by jaade on Jul 30, 2013 15:50:26 GMT
According to the Night actions thread, Colby kills Cookies. :/ And Burby kills me again! Ok, so Day should start with Meeko Bill Colby Dizzy Two kills equals Town victory, in my mind. The masons are confirmed to each other, they know that if Colby is SK, he can wait until last scum is dead.
|
|
|
Post by paranoia on Jul 31, 2013 3:39:27 GMT
Even if they've already lost, they still have to decide between lynching the scum and the serial killer. Actually, not lynching may be a viable option. In our case of 2 masons, 1 vigilante, and 1 scum, if there is no lynch, the scum gets a last kill and the vig gets the last scum. Game over, town wins. In the counterfactual case of 2 masons, 1 serial killer, and 1 scum, if there is no lynch, anyone could win. Let's assume the serial killer wins if the game ends (all scum dead, or number of scum greater than or equal to number of other players) and they're still alive. Scum and serial killer could kill each other and town wins. Scum and serial killer could kill both town, and serial killer wins. Scum can only win if they kill the serial killer and the serial killer kills town. Very nice set up for mind games. :evil: Anyway, if Colby were a serial killer, the town's best hope would be a no lynch. And if Colby is a town vigilante, then a no lynch still results in a town win. That's pretty much what you do as town in a situation where there's a potential sk - no lynch, let the killers sort themselves out.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jul 31, 2013 10:32:30 GMT
Even if they've already lost, they still have to decide between lynching the scum and the serial killer. Actually, not lynching may be a viable option. In our case of 2 masons, 1 vigilante, and 1 scum, if there is no lynch, the scum gets a last kill and the vig gets the last scum. Game over, town wins. In the counterfactual case of 2 masons, 1 serial killer, and 1 scum, if there is no lynch, anyone could win. Let's assume the serial killer wins if the game ends (all scum dead, or number of scum greater than or equal to number of other players) and they're still alive. Scum and serial killer could kill each other and town wins. Scum and serial killer could kill both town, and serial killer wins. Scum can only win if they kill the serial killer and the serial killer kills town. Very nice set up for mind games. :evil: Anyway, if Colby were a serial killer, the town's best hope would be a no lynch. And if Colby is a town vigilante, then a no lynch still results in a town win. That's pretty much what you do as town in a situation where there's a potential sk - no lynch, let the killers sort themselves out. right. i haven't been to the scum board. why did Dizzy choose Mahaloth over Bill?
|
|
|
Post by jaade on Jul 31, 2013 17:14:18 GMT
She thought Colby would kill Bill if he were 3rd party
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Aug 1, 2013 13:49:31 GMT
I was hoping IF and only IF Colby was a SK, he would scum side and kill a mason. Bill and Meeko would have been better targets for him than Mahaloth.
Once he killed Cookies, there was really no hope of me vs the masons.
I think I did fairly well with the mess we had in the end, and was shocked that I actually had a slight chance of winning this one.
|
|